2 x AMD EPYC 9554 vs. 2 x AMD EPYC 9654 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 361 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 59% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core) was 1.069x the speed of the slowest (2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: oneDNN (Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU) at 2.326x, oneDNN (Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU) at 1.651x, OpenRadioss (Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation) at 1.608x, oneDNN (Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU) at 1.519x, Sysbench (Test: CPU) at 1.455x, BRL-CAD (VGR Performance Metric) at 1.428x, CockroachDB (Workload: KV, 95% Reads - Concurrency: 512) at 1.413x, Coremark (CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second) at 1.353x, Xmrig (Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M) at 1.349x, TensorFlow (Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50) at 1.337x.

361 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread